Welcome to the 78th edition of our Newsletter EdGenie's 📜 Sunday Scroll...

Every Sunday I send out actionable tips, tricks and real-world application insights from my 15 year experience coaching students to achieve As and A*s in their Economics A Levels via EdGenie.

Hey Genies, 👋

If you’re spending most of your revision time just learning content, let me tell you why that’s not the best way to secure an A or A*.

 I see too many students fall into this trap:

• They watch hours of YouTube videos. 📺
• They take pages of beautiful notes. 📝
• They make endless flashcards. 🔄

And yet, when they sit a real exam question, they freeze. ❄️

Why?
Because A-Level Economics isn’t just about knowing content—it’s about applying it.

That’s where most students go wrong.

They assume that memorising theory will automatically translate into good exam answers.
It won’t.

Here’s what actually works:
💡 Question Practice.

Here’s why it’s a grade-changer:

1️⃣ It exposes your weaknesses. You’ll quickly realise where your knowledge gaps are when you struggle to answer a question.
2️⃣ It builds exam technique. Knowing the content isn’t enough—you need to know how to structure your answers to hit top marks.
3️⃣ It helps with recall. The more you apply concepts in context, the easier they’ll stick. Flashcards won’t save you in the exam.
4️⃣ It makes you faster. Writing under timed or examinable conditions forces you to think and respond like you would in the real exam.
5️⃣ It gets you feedback. You need to see where you’re going wrong and how to fix it—this is the difference between a B and an A/A*.

👉 So, what should you do?

For every topic, stop passively reading.

Instead:

• Pick a past question.
• Write a full question/essay plan. (or if you're short on time, bullet points work too)
• Attempt the question under timed conditions.
• Get feedback and improve.

And if you need real feedback, proper exam technique guidance, and structured question practice, that’s literally what we do at EdGenie.

You could keep rereading your notes…

Or you could start practising like the top students do.

You decide.

Best,

Emre 🚀

Oxford and Cambridge’s Economic Potential 🏛️ – Both cities are globally recognised for innovation, particularly in biotech and AI, but their small size and high costs limit their economic impact.

Government’s Growth Agenda 📈 – Chancellor Rachel Reeves has revived plans to develop the Oxford-Cambridge Arc, aiming to create “Europe’s Silicon Valley” by improving transport links and housing.

Infrastructure Constraints 🚆 – Travel between Oxford and Cambridge is slow, with no direct rail link. A new railway, including a station at Tempsford, is planned, with £7bn expected in funding.

Housing and Planning Challenges 🏡 – Strict planning laws, green belt restrictions, and high housing costs have hindered business growth. Reeves proposes a zoning scheme to encourage development near railways.

Comparison with US Innovation Hubs 🇺🇸 – Unlike Boston and Silicon Valley, Oxford and Cambridge lack the scale and infrastructure to support large business clusters, reducing economic efficiency.

Labour and Investment Issues 💼 – The success of the Arc depends on access to skilled workers and investment capital, which could be affected by restrictive immigration policies and limited pension fund investments in startups.

Political and Regional Trade-offs ⚖️ – Funding the Arc may cause political tension, as some argue investment should go to northern cities like Leeds instead. Labour, however, faces less resistance from anti-development voters.

Future Outlook 🔮 – The project has potential to boost UK GDP by £14bn annually by 2035 if executed effectively, but challenges remain in securing funding, addressing housing shortages, and navigating political opposition.

Q. Explain the concept of economies of agglomeration and analyse how linking Oxford and Cambridge could enhance economic productivity.
A. Economies of agglomeration occur when businesses and industries benefit from being close to one another, leading to lower costs, knowledge spillovers, and improved productivity. By linking Oxford and Cambridge, workers and firms can collaborate more effectively, fostering innovation in high-tech sectors like biotech and AI. Increased labour mobility would allow businesses to access a larger pool of skilled workers, reducing hiring constraints. Improved transport links could also lower commuting times and logistics costs, enhancing overall efficiency. In contrast, without proper housing and infrastructure, congestion and overcrowding could offset these benefits.

Q. Evaluate the extent to which infrastructure investment, such as the Oxford-to-Cambridge railway, can correct market failure and improve economic efficiency.
A. Market failure arises when resources are not allocated efficiently, such as in transport bottlenecks that increase costs and limit mobility. Infrastructure investment can address these failures by reducing travel times and improving access to jobs and business opportunities, leading to greater productivity. The railway could encourage private investment, enhancing economic growth and regional development. However, the effectiveness depends on execution—delays, cost overruns, or environmental concerns could reduce net benefits. There’s also an opportunity cost, as funds allocated to this project could have been used elsewhere, such as in the North.

Q. Discuss the potential trade-offs the government faces in prioritising investment in the Oxford-Cambridge Arc over funding for northern cities like Leeds.
A. Investing in the Oxford-Cambridge Arc could drive economic growth due to the region’s high-tech industries and skilled workforce, generating long-term productivity gains. However, prioritising this over investment in northern cities like Leeds may exacerbate regional inequality, as the North has historically received less infrastructure funding. While the Arc may yield higher returns, boosting growth in underdeveloped areas could have broader social benefits, such as reducing unemployment. Political considerations also matter—neglecting the North may alienate voters and weaken support for government policies. The best strategy might involve balancing investment between both regions.

Q. Using economic theory, explain how labour shortages and restrictive immigration policies could limit the success of the Oxford-Cambridge Arc.
A. Labour shortages occur when the demand for skilled workers exceeds supply, leading to higher wages and potential inefficiencies. The Oxford-Cambridge Arc relies on skilled labour for innovation and research, but restrictive immigration policies could limit the availability of workers, constraining business growth. A lack of skilled employees could discourage foreign investment and reduce knowledge spillovers, slowing the region’s economic momentum. If wages rise too much due to shortages, firms may relocate to other countries with a more flexible labour market. Policies encouraging high-skilled immigration could help sustain growth and innovation.

If you or your child are looking to Boost your A level Economics Grades in under 30 days, I'd recommend starting with an all-in-one support network where you get 24/7 access to a SuperTutor:

→ Join EdGenie 🧞‍♂️: Transform your A-Level Economics essays and exam marks (genuinely) with our comprehensive on-demand learning platform. This carefully curated course blends engaging content with effective exam techniques, the same ones that have empowered over 1,000 of my students to achieve an A or A* over the last 13 years.