A/A* Guarantee

7 Day Money-Back
Guarantee

Home > Edgenie Sunday Schroll: Newsletter >Stop Writing Full Essays – Here’s a Better Way to Get Top Marks!

Welcome to the 65th edition of our Newsletter EdGenie's 📜 Sunday Scroll...

Every Sunday I send out actionable tips, tricks and real-world application insights from my 15 year experience coaching students to achieve As and A*s in their Economics A Levels via EdGenie.

Jump to Section:


Stop Writing Full Essays – Here’s a Better Way to Get Top Marks!

Hey Genies, 🧞‍♂️

Let me tell you the formula that really gets results in A-Level Economics.

It’s simple: High Quality, High Quantity, High Variety.

This is what will push your grades up and give you the confidence to walk into that exam room ready for anything they throw at you.

But here’s the kicker – you don’t need to write full essays every time to get there.

In fact, focusing on Detailed Essay Plans rather than full essays is often far more effective.

Here’s why:
A full essay is just paragraphs of blocks of writing, right?

It’s time-consuming, repetitive, and, let’s face it, a bit overwhelming when it comes to revision and practice as there are so many topics and questions to get through.

For example, imagine you're writing a chain of reasoning on how high interest rates impact inequality.

You’d likely end up with something like this:

When interest rates rise, the immediate effect is an increase in the cost of borrowing. This impacts all households, but it’s especially challenging for low-income families. Higher borrowing costs mean that it becomes more expensive to take out loans or use credit to finance purchases. For low-income households, borrowing is often necessary to fund essential expenses like education, housing, or healthcare.With higher interest rates, these families are either forced to borrow at greater expense, which burdens them with more debt, or to forgo these essential purchases entirely. This directly limits their ability to invest in opportunities that could help them improve their economic status, such as education or home ownership, which further entrenches their financial struggles. In contrast, wealthier households are less dependent on borrowing to finance their purchases. They may already have savings or assets that they can draw on, so they’re less affected by higher interest rates. They continue to accumulate wealth while low-income households face mounting costs and reduced access to opportunities. As a result, the income gap between low and high-income households widens. The inability of low-income families to invest in their future perpetuates a cycle of inequality. This creates a systemic disadvantage, whereby the rich get richer, and the poor find it increasingly difficult to catch up. The overall effect is an increase in income inequality within the economy".

Now, here’s the question: how would you revise from that?

How do you know what to improve, take out, or add?

It’s difficult.

Yes, the answer above looks like something perfect you would write in an essay ofcourse or in your tests and homework absolutely!

But if you build Essay Plans with arrows and steps, you eliminate the fluff and focus on clarity.

Here’s how that same chain of reasoning might look in a plan:

1️⃣ High interest rates lead to increased borrowing costs →
2️⃣ Low-income households face greater difficulty in accessing credit →
3️⃣ Reduced ability for low-income households to finance essential needs (e.g., education, housing, healthcare) →
4️⃣ Lower levels of investment in future opportunities by low-income households →
5️⃣ Wealthier households less impacted due to reliance on savings and assets rather than borrowing →
6️⃣ Income gap between low-income and high-income households widens as wealthier households continue to accumulate wealth →
7️⃣ Increased economic inequality as low-income households remain trapped in a cycle of limited financial mobility →
8️⃣ Systemic disadvantage and entrenched inequality in the economy

See the difference?

With this approach, you can review your points quickly, add where needed, and remove what’s unnecessary – all while saving time and energy when practicing.

Why I Preach This on EdGenie:
1️⃣ Quality Check: It’s impossible to waffle or go off-topic with a clear, structured plan. Your reasoning stays sharp and on-point.
2️⃣ Time Saver: You save about 70% of your time with essay plans compared to full essays. That’s time you can spend on other topics or even other subjects.
3️⃣ High Variety: You can practice different variations of similar questions far more easily. This way, you’re prepared for any twist they throw at you in the exam.

This method isn’t just theory; it works. 🔥
It’s how EdGenie students consistently improve their grades and secure those top marks.


So, next time you sit down to study, maybe you can skip the full essay.

Instead, plan it out with arrows, steps, and structure.

I'm not saying skip it completely as you have to do it for homework or for test but maybe when you're practicing for differfor every 5 essay plans write out 1 essay to make sure you know how to write out fully!

And watch your grades climb.

Cheers to quality, quantity, and variety!

Best,

Emre


​Tariffs are hard work

Summary

📜 Copyright Policy Reminder: Sharing articles without using the FT's sharing tools breaches copyright rules. Subscribers can share limited articles monthly using the gift article service.

💼 Trump’s Tariff Approach: Trump advocates significant tariffs, proposing 10–20% blanket tariffs on all foreign trade and possibly increasing duties on Chinese goods to 60%.

🛠️ Biden Administration Continuity: Biden retained Trump’s China tariffs and expanded them, showing bipartisan support for a tough stance on Beijing.

📊 Negotiation or Protectionism?: While Trump’s tariffs might be intended for negotiation, uniform tariffs could serve as a protectionist trade policy with uncertain outcomes.

🌎 Reciprocal Tariff Complexities: Matching tariffs with other countries may lead to unintended issues, such as affecting products like coffee where the US has no domestic production interest.

🏛️ Legal and Political Hurdles: Imposing universal tariffs faces legal challenges and lacks clear historical precedent under US trade laws. Congressional approval is uncertain.

🌐 Economic Disruption Risk: Universal tariffs could disrupt industries reliant on global supply chains, affecting sectors like tech, construction, and consumer goods.

🤔 Trade Challenges Ahead: A universal tariff policy raises doubts about effectiveness and practicality, with potential long-term impacts on international trade relations.

A Level Economics Questions:

Q. Explain how tariffs can impact domestic industries.
A. Tariffs raise the price of imported goods, making domestic products more competitive. This can protect local industries from foreign competition, potentially leading to higher production and employment domestically. However, tariffs may also increase costs for consumers and industries relying on imported materials, reducing overall economic efficiency.

Q. Discuss why countries often impose tariffs on specific goods rather than blanket tariffs.
​A. Targeted tariffs allow countries to protect strategic industries, such as agriculture or technology, without disrupting broader trade relationships. Blanket tariffs, by contrast, can be economically disruptive and legally complex. Additionally, targeted tariffs are more effective in negotiating trade concessions from specific nations.

Q. To what extent do tariffs influence consumer behaviour in an economy?
​A. Tariffs increase the price of imported goods, incentivising consumers to buy domestically produced alternatives. This can benefit local businesses but may limit consumer choice and result in higher prices. In the long term, reduced competition might lead to inefficiencies and less innovation in domestic industries.

​Q. Why might universal tariffs lead to legal disputes under WTO rules?
A. Universal tariffs may violate WTO rules if they exceed agreed limits (bound tariffs) or fail to adhere to non-discrimination principles. Such policies can provoke legal challenges from affected nations, undermining the credibility of the imposing country and potentially leading to retaliatory measures. This creates uncertainty in international trade.

Possible A Level Economics 25 Marker Question

Evaluate the extent to which tariffs are an effective tool for achieving a country’s economic objectives. (25 marks)

Infographic of the Week

Where Europe Taxes Its Top Earners the Most

Income tax rates across Europe reflect varying approaches to funding public services, with progressive systems taxing higher incomes at steeper rates to support social welfare, while flat-tax nations focus on simplicity and competitiveness. Among 36 European countries, Denmark (55.9%), France (55.4%), and Austria (55%) lead with the highest top statutory income tax rates, while Bulgaria and Romania have the lowest at 10%. Scandinavian nations, known for robust social safety nets, maintain higher rates to fund universal healthcare and education. Significant reforms are underway in Denmark, where a new tax structure will impose a marginal rate of up to 60.5% for high earners from 2026. Overall, the European OECD average top rate is 42.8%, highlighting the region’s diversity in balancing taxation with economic and social goals.

Chart of the Week

Net-Zero Goals: Progress or Promises?

Around half of the world's countries, responsible for 80% of global greenhouse gas emissions, have pledged to achieve carbon neutrality, many by 2050 or 2060, but the quality of these commitments varies significantly. According to Climate Action Tracker, only 7% of emissions are under credible plans, covering nations like the UK and the EU, while 21% are rated as average, including the US and Germany. Alarmingly, nearly 50% of emissions come from poor-quality plans in major polluters like China, India, and Russia. For 7% of emissions, data is insufficient to assess plan quality, including countries like Brazil and Indonesia, while 5% of emissions, from nations like Mexico and Egypt, lack net-zero targets altogether. This underscores the need for stronger and more transparent climate strategies globally.

Macroeconomic Data


Whenever you're ready there is one way I can help you.

If you or your child are looking to Boost your A level Economics Grades in under 30 days, I'd recommend starting with an all-in-one support network where you get 24/7 access to a SuperTutor:

Join EdGenie 🧞‍♂️: Transform your A-Level Economics essays and exam marks (genuinely) with our comprehensive on-demand learning platform. This carefully curated course blends engaging content with effective exam techniques, the same ones that have empowered over 1,000 of my students to achieve an A or A* over the last 13 years. 
A huge thanks for hopping on board EdGenie's Wednesday Wisdoms newsletter! 
I'm Emre, and I've got a big goal - to make A* education accessible to all A-level students.
And it Starts With You!

Emre Aksahin
Chief Learning Officer at Edgenie